What’s at StakeArticlesAthlete FeedbackAdvocacySports Act & HistorySourcesRecommended ViewingStay Informed
What’s at Stake

U.S. Biathlon is an independent National Governing Body.

A proposed operating alliance with U.S. Ski & Snowboard could fundamentally change how our sport is governed. This site brings together the proposal, independent reporting, athlete feedback, governing documents, historical context, and Team Independent Biathlon’s advocacy so members can review the material and decide for themselves.

Newest Independent Reporting

NEW SURVEY SNAPSHOT • AUGUST 31, 2026

Another Independent Survey Finds Strong Opposition to the Proposed USBA–USSS Relationship

A newly released independent stakeholder survey adds another data point to feedback already gathered from athletes and the broader biathlon community. Across four separate surveys, support for moving forward with the proposed USBA–USSS relationship has remained a minority position among the groups responding.

Four Surveys. A Consistent Message.

Support for the proposed relationship remained a minority response in each survey. The questions, respondent groups and methods differed, so these results should be read as a pattern—not as a single combined scientific poll.

The newest stakeholder survey included 108 respondents, including 65 current coaches or officials/referees/TDs.

Target graphic showing that 94.4 percent of 108 stakeholder survey respondents did not select approval of the agreement as currently contemplated
Survey
SUPPORT
NEUTRAL / OTHER
OPPOSE / CONCERNED
June Athlete Survey
27 athlete responses
7.4%
support
14.8%
neutral
77.8%
concerned / very concerned
July Athlete Follow-Up
41 athlete responses
12.2%
yes
26.8%
neutral
61.0%
no
TIB Website Vote
Anonymous, opt-in live vote
loading…
proxy support

two-choice vote
loading…
keep independent
Independent Stakeholder Survey — Aug. 28
108 responses
15.0%
support
17.0%
neutral / need more information
68.0%
oppose
Simple average of the four support percentages: calculating from live TIB vote…
For the TIB vote, a thumbs-down response to “Do you support keeping Biathlon an independent NGB?” is used only as a rough proxy for support of the proposed relationship. The average is unweighted and descriptive only.

The new stakeholder survey reports that 68% of all 108 respondents opposed the relationship as currently understood, while 15% supported it and 17% were neutral or needed more information.

View the Independent Stakeholder Survey Results (PDF) →

Independent survey presented by Zach Hall, Shawn Robison, Matt Sabasteanski & Tracy Lamb. TIB did not conduct this survey. The comparison above uses the principal support/opposition question from each survey where possible; wording and populations differ.

NEW UPDATE • AUGUST 28, 2026

USBA Postpones Board Meeting on Proposed Alliance

U.S. Biathlon has announced that the Board meeting concerning the proposed U.S. Ski & Snowboard alliance operating agreement has been rescheduled to allow additional time for Board review, comment and completion of the draft agreement.

No new meeting date has been announced.

“The pause in the rushed effort to obtain a positive vote for an alliance provides the biathlon community with an opportunity to voice their questions and opinions to those directly responsible for developing a proposal for a vote.” — Art Stegen

COMMENTARY / OPINION • ART STEGEN • AUGUST 28, 2026

Art Stegen: “What’s Going On?”

Team Independent Biathlon co-founder Art Stegen examines the postponed meeting, the history of the proposed USSS relationship, Sports Act questions, and what he believes the additional time should mean for USBA members.

Stegen argues that the pause provides an opportunity for members to raise their questions and concerns directly with those responsible for developing the proposal.

Read Art Stegen’s Commentary (PDF) →

Commentary reflects the author’s views. Published as submitted on August 28.

NEW • AUGUST 24, 2026 • TIB GOVERNANCE FILING

TIB Co-Founders File Grievance Challenging July 29 Board Appointment

Team Independent Biathlon co-founders Art Stegen, Joan Wilder and Edward G. Williams filed a grievance with U.S. Biathlon on August 24 challenging the Board’s July 29 action to fill a purported director vacancy.

The grievance alleges that the action violated USBA Bylaws governing director elections and vacancies, and asks that the July 29 appointment be declared a nullity and set aside. These are the allegations and requested relief of the grievants; the filing does not itself constitute a ruling on the merits.

Read the Filed Grievance (PDF) →

Team Independent BiathlonGovernance requires process.Filed August 24, 2026

TIB is publishing the grievance as filed so members can read the allegations and requested relief directly.

NEW MEMBER RESPONSE • AUGUST 23, 2026

Art Stegen Responds to CEO Concerns About Treatment of Athlete Representatives

Team Independent Biathlon statement supporting respectful treatment of athlete representatives and all USBA members

On August 23, US Biathlon CEO Jack Gierhart wrote to Art Stegen expressing concern that athlete representatives on the Board were being harassed by some members of the biathlon community. Gierhart said US Biathlon was investigating whether reported incidents violated its Code of Conduct or Ethics and asked Stegen to help ensure athletes are treated respectfully.

Stegen responded the same day. He agreed that athlete representatives, Board members and staff should be treated respectfully, while arguing that frustration surrounding the proposed U.S. Ski & Snowboard relationship stems in part from unresolved governance, transparency and procedural concerns. With Art’s permission, we publish his response below in full.

Art Stegen’s Response — August 23, 2026

Jack,

Thanks for your response. I am equally disappointed that there may be some disrespect for you, the athletes' representatives, and any BOD member caused by the attempt to create some type of integration or alliance between the USBA and US Ski & Snowboard. I am sure that the members of the BOD and the athletes' representatives are facing both external and internal pressure from both sides of the issue. It has caused a sense of frustration within the biathlon community, encouraged by the nature of its development, unclear explanations, and unanswered questions. As you are aware, I have previously stated my lack of support due to concerns about compliance with the Ted Stevens Sports Act, LLC, not-for-profit law, USOPC and USBA Bylaws, and IBU certification. However, since I first became aware of the USBA's attempt to enter some type of arrangement or agreement with US Ski & Snowboard, other issues have reinforced my resistance, as well as that of the biathlon community. Among those are the reasons why I have signed complaints to the Complaint and Grievance Committee.

Lack of transparency, including unannounced meetings, the personal recommendation for the improper replacement for a purported BOD vacancy without following USBA Bylaws procedure, and then immediately adding that individual to the Alliance working group does not give reassurance of good governance. A hastily called and then cancelled BOD meeting that intended to have an immediate vote on a proposal for integration without advance knowledge, and a second BOD meeting that then went into a three-hour-long executive session for the purpose of responding to an ethics complaint but evolved into a discussion of a proposal for an immediate vote on the integration with US Ski & Snowboard, lacked transparency and seemed deceptive. Violation of conflict-of-interest standards that required a complaint to resolve is another issue that weakens trust in USBA leadership.

The fact that discussions of this issue were initiated in 2024, by all appearances by the US Ski & Snowboard's CEO Sophie Goldschmidt, soon after USBA's relocation to Utah, with those discussions not disclosed until your May 19, 2026, letter to the membership, has elements of secrecy and elusiveness, which also weakens confidence in leadership. The suggestions of Sophie Goldschmidt's letter to the USBA membership and Anouk Patty comments about the benefits and greater funding for USBA under an arrangement are vague and speak more to the motives of creating a super action NGB fundraising. But knowing the limited funding for the Nordic disciplines under the alpine-dominated US Ski & Snowboard, why would USBA expect anything different?

Ceding many USBA organizational and management requirements to another NGB will compromise USBA autonomy and compliance. Knowing the efforts to control US Surfing and US Skateboarding, it is difficult to see how it is in the best interests of USBA but that of US Ski & Snowboard. Threats of the loss of funding, but a promise to restore that loss if an agreement is affirmed, is coercion. The manner and urgency with which the USBA BOD has approached this agreement has strengthened my lack of support and created greater resistance in the biathlon community to any arrangement with U.S. Ski & Snowboard.

Finally, if there have been instances of disrespect, coercion, or incidents of harassment that violate the U.S. Biathlon Code of Conduct or Ethics, athletes and BOD members need to come forward to confirm such behavior.

Regards

Member response published with Art Stegen’s permission. Jack Gierhart’s email is summarized above rather than reproduced in full.

WHILE THE BOARD REVIEW CONTINUES

Three Ways to Make Your Voice Heard

With the Board meeting postponed and review of the proposed agreement continuing, these resources remain available to members and supporters.

Please communicate respectfully and in your own words.

Do you support keeping Biathlon an independent NGB as required by federal law?

Cast your vote — no sign-up needed.

Latest Coverage & Updates

NEW MEMBER LETTER • AUGUST 22, 2026

Art Stegen: Athlete Representatives Are Board Members — Their Governance Role Matters

In a new letter to USBA leadership, longtime member Art Stegen challenges the suggestion that Athlete Representatives should be viewed as speaking only for a narrowly defined group of 10-year athletes. He points to the broader governance responsibilities that come with serving on a nonprofit Board and argues that athlete voices should remain fully included in decisions affecting the future of U.S. Biathlon.

“There is nothing in the USBA Bylaws that specifically restricts athlete representation.”

Read Art Stegen’s Letter (PDF) →

Member submission. The views expressed are the author’s own.

NEW COMMUNITY SURVEY • AUGUST 19, 2026

Field of Play Community Survey: Make Your Voice Heard

An independent group of longtime USBA members and IBU Technical Delegates is asking coaches, officials, volunteers, athletes, parents, club leaders, and other supporters what should be protected, improved, or guaranteed in any future organizational relationship.

TIB is helping share this independent survey so as many knowledgeable and engaged voices as possible can be heard.

TAKE THE SURVEY →

Independent survey organized by Zach Hall, Shawn Robison, Matt Sabasteanski & Tracy Lamb. It is not a TIB or USBA survey.

NEW BEFORE THE BOARD VOTES

Ask Questions. Make Your Voice Heard.

Team Independent Biathlon has compiled consolidated due-diligence questions raised across the biathlon community, along with contact information for the current USBA Board members considering this decision.

Please be respectful, identify your connection to U.S. Biathlon, and share your questions and views in your own words.

NEW MEMBER LETTER • AUGUST 18, 2026

Jay Bowerman to the USBA Board: “This Decision Is About Much More Than Money”

Two-time U.S. Olympic biathlete and USBA life member Jay Bowerman has written to the USBA Board and Integration Committee, drawing on more than 50 years of nonprofit leadership experience. His message: major organizational change cannot succeed without the informed support of athletes, coaches, clubs, and volunteers.

Read Jay Bowerman’s Letter (PDF) →

Earlier Coverage & Background
KEY ANALYSIS MEMBER PERSPECTIVE • AUGUST 12, 2026

Change, Risk & Governance: Questions Before USBA Votes

In a new member submission, Art Stegen examines the proposed USSS–USBA Strategic Alliance through three lenses: how organizational change has been handled, whether the risks have been adequately assessed, and whether the proposed governance structure would preserve USBA's autonomy and independent decision-making.

Read Art Stegen’s Submission (PDF) →

More Cake — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click poster to view full size.

NEW TIB BOARD QUESTIONS • AUGUST 14, 2026

Not a Napkin Plan: TIB’s Questions for USBA Directors

The consolidated member due-diligence questions are now published. They are intended to help members and Directors examine legal, governance, financial, athlete-rights, operational, and termination issues before a final vote.

Read the Questions (PDF) →

Not a Napkin Plan — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click poster to view full size.

NEW USBA UPDATE • AUGUST 13, 2026

August 27 Alliance Meeting Postponed

U.S. Biathlon had scheduled a Special Board Meeting for August 27 to review and vote on the proposed Strategic Alliance Agreement. The meeting was subsequently postponed to provide the Board additional time for review, comment and draft completion.

A new meeting date has not yet been announced.

Follow USBA Strategic Alliance Updates →

Source: USBA member email distributed August 13, 2026.

NEW MEMBER UPDATE • AUGUST 10, 2026

Ethics Complaint Filed Alleging Lack of Notice for Earlier USBA Board Meetings

Team Independent Biathlon co-founders Art Stegen, Joan Wilder, and Ed Williams have filed an ethics complaint under the USBA grievance procedures alleging that members were not provided notice of the March 26–27 and April 29, 2026 Board meetings as required by Chapter 17 of the USBA Bylaws. The complaint requests review through the procedures established by the USBA bylaws and asks the Ethics Committee to determine whether the bylaws governing member notice and attendance were followed.

The complaint alleges that members were denied the opportunity to attend and observe those Board meetings and argues that transparency, member participation, and adherence to governing documents are essential principles for an independent National Governing Body. The requested relief includes a written decision by the Ethics Committee and appropriate action if violations of the bylaws are found.

Team Independent Biathlon poster announcing an ethics complaint concerning notice of USBA Board meetings
NEW USBA UPDATE • AUGUST 7, 2026

USBA Announces Special Board Meeting

U.S. Biathlon has notified members that the Board of Directors will hold a Special Meeting on August 14, 2026 to consider an ethics complaint involving Board member Dexter Paine.

According to the notice distributed by USBA Secretary Sara Studebaker Hall, the meeting has been called as a Special Meeting pursuant to Chapter 17 of the USBA Bylaws and will be conducted via Zoom.

Source: USBA member email distributed August 7, 2026.

Member Contributions
MEMBER LETTER • AUGUST 5, 2026

Letter to USBA Leadership from Art Stegen

Art Stegen shares observations from the August 1 summer roller ski championships in Jericho, Vermont, and raises questions about the proposed USSS–USBA operating alliance.

Read Art’s letter (PDF) →

MEMBER RESEARCH • AUGUST 2026

USBA-USSS Integration Analysis

A 16-page analysis prepared to help the USBA Board evaluate the proposed integration. It brings together a Max Cobb presentation, interviews across biathlon and Nordic sports, concerns about funding, athlete development and governance, and alternatives—including ways to work with USSS while preserving greater safeguards.

Read the full analysis (PDF) →

Independent Reporting
Associated Press • July 29, 2026

U.S. Biathlon pushes back merger with U.S. Ski & Snowboard

Read the original AP reporting →

FasterSkier • July 28, 2026

Biathlon at a Crossroads

Read the original FasterSkier feature →

Stay Informed

FEDERAL LAW

Federal law (36 U.S.C. §220522(6)) requires that a national governing body:

"demonstrates that it is a member of no more than one international sports federation that governs a sport included on the program of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, the Pan-American Games, or the Parapan American Games."

Why This Law Exists

Why Independent NGB Governance Exists

Congress created the modern NGB structure to protect athlete rights and prevent over-centralized control.

The site’s historical section traces the AAU/NCAA power struggle, the limits of the old amateur-sport system, and Congress’s response in the Amateur Sports Act of 1978. That history matters here because today’s debate is not only about shared services—it is about who holds governing authority over U.S. Biathlon and how athlete and member voices are protected.

Official USOPC Governance Documents & Bylaws →

Read the full AAU / Amateur Sports Act history and source material
Historical Context
Why Congress created the Amateur Sports Act matters to today's debate.

The history below — including the AAU/NCAA struggle over athlete control and Congress's response in 1978 — remains a central part of this site's explanation of why independent sport governance was established.

The one-sport, one-governing-body rule isn't a technicality — it exists because of a real, decades-long history of athletes being harmed when multiple organizations fought over control of their sport.

Athletes caught in a 50-year turf war

Before 1978, the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) acted as the de facto national authority over amateur sports and Olympic team selection, and repeatedly clashed with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) over who controlled athletes. The dispute dated back to 1923, when the AAU suspended a sprinter for competing in a European meet against its wishes, and it continued for decades as the two organizations punished each other's athletes — hurting U.S. Olympic teams in the process. Athletes had no say in a fight that was, at its core, about institutional control rather than their own interests.

Direct, unaccountable control over athletes

The AAU had also adopted arbitrary rules barring women from running events and banning any runner who had competed alongside a shoe-sponsored athlete — the kind of unchecked authority over athletes' careers that helped drive Congress to act.

Congress's fix: independence for every sport

The Amateur Sports Act of 1978 (renamed the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act in 1998) created the U.S. Olympic Committee and required a single, independent National Governing Body for each individual Olympic sport — stripping the AAU of its long-standing monopoly. By late 1980, the AAU had to give up control of eight Olympic and Pan American sports it had governed. The commission that studied the problem specifically called for an authority strong enough to prevent competing organizations from ever again fighting over the same athletes.

Sources: Wikipedia: Amateur Sports Act of 1978, Encyclopedia of Sports Management and Marketing, Congress.gov: S.2727

Primary Source • Federal Law
Title 36, U.S. Code, Chapter 2205

Read the current federal statutory text directly from the official U.S. House U.S. Code website.

Open the official U.S. Code →

Official USOPC Governance Source

Ted Stevens Act & USOPC Bylaws

The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee maintains its current governing documents in one official location, including the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act and the USOPC Bylaws.

Open USOPC Governance Documents & Bylaws →

The existing U.S. House U.S. Code link remains on this site as an additional primary source for the federal statutory text.

Concerns

The concerns of Team Independent Biathlon were reviewed by Ed Williams, an Olympic biathlete and an experienced commercial litigator with over thirty years of experience as a former Assistant United States Attorney and then a partner in large New York City law firms. Mr. Williams specializes in sports law, arbitrations, civil trials, and appeals, and has been active in sports law, principally sports on the Olympic program, for his entire legal career.

  • Board leadership: We have serious concerns about decisions made by current USBA board leadership that we believe have not served the best interests of the membership.
  • Conflict of interest: We are concerned that at least one individual has served on the boards of both USBA and USSS during the same period that USSS has pursued a merger with USBA, creating a conflict of interest at a critical decision point for the organization.
  • Board nomination process: We believe a recent Board appointment did not follow USBA's required nomination procedures, which call for candidates to go through the Nominating, Governance and Ethics Committee.
  • Transparency and bylaws: We are concerned that the USBA Board has held closed meetings that we believe were not conducted in accordance with USBA's own bylaws.

Athlete Feedback

Ahead of the board's decision, USBA athletes were surveyed and gathered for a town hall to share their views on the proposed merger. Results below are from 27 athletes surveyed and the discussion that followed.

25 · 93% Concerned or very concerned
4 · 15% Neutral / need more info
2 · 7% Somewhat supportive
Issues ranked by frequency (8 issues)

1. Athlete funding and financial support — 26 of 27 athletes (96%)

Athletes worry that stipends, performance bonuses, race expense coverage, and youth/junior camp budgets could be cut once initial funding protections expire, pointing to USSS's cross-country athletes — many unpaid — as a cautionary comparison. At the town hall, USSS leadership committed to ring-fencing existing funding and adding roughly $500K in year one, but athletes pushed back that a verbal commitment isn't enough without a binding agreement.

"The amount of support and funding that USBA provides to its developing athletes right now is vital. Without that support, I'm unsure how many of our current Youth and Junior athletes would be able to continue at the level that they do." — Survey respondent, JNT athlete

2. Long-term survival of the sport — 23 of 27 athletes (85%)

Nordic combined and ski jumping are frequently cited as examples of smaller Nordic sports being sidelined under USSS. Athletes are concerned that a several-year protection window is mismatched with the decade-plus timeline biathletes typically need to develop internationally competitive results.

"What happened to Nordic combined and smaller Nordic sports under the USSS umbrella should be an enormous red flag." — Survey respondent

3. Athlete voice and governance representation — 17 of 27 athletes (63%)

Athletes fear biathlon's interests could get diluted inside a larger, multi-sport organization, and many felt the timeline for the board's decision didn't leave enough room for a change of this magnitude to be properly considered.

"My worry is that with a merger, the concerns of biathlon will just get muddled in with the plethora of other sports, and decisions will be made by people who don't have the best interest of biathlon as a singular sport." — Survey respondent

4. Transparency and rationale for the merger — 17 of 27 athletes (63%)

Many athletes said they don't understand what USBA stands to gain that it couldn't pursue independently, or what's actually motivating the arrangement from USSS's side.

"Is it a collaboration? Merger? Absorption? Will USBA and the members and athletes be able to keep the USBA identity, or are we just handing over our operational freedom for quick money and a temporary fix?" — Survey respondent

5. Governance structure and decision rights — 16 of 27 athletes (59%)

Athletes questioned whether the USBA board, once folded into USSS as a sport committee, would retain real binding authority or become purely advisory — with biathlon-specific decisions ultimately subject to override.

"USSS is a medals and money focused org, not a team, athlete, and integrity focused org. Any protections should not be trusted." — Survey respondent

6. Team selection procedures — 15 of 27 athletes (56%)

IBU World Cup fields differ significantly in size from FIS Nordic fields, and athletes worry that performance standards built for cross-country wouldn't translate fairly, with no USSS equivalent to biathlon's development circuit.

7. Coaching, high-performance resources and culture — 14 of 27 athletes (52%)

Athletes described USBA's current culture as team- and integrity-focused, in contrast to what they see as a more medals-and-revenue-driven orientation at USSS, and flagged existing tension between dedicated biathletes and cross-over athletes as something a merger could deepen.

8. Youth and junior development pipeline — ~12 of 27 athletes (44%)

Junior national team athletes praised USBA's current youth programming for its individualized, development-focused approach, and worried a merger could shift toward a more generic, time-trial-based model.

"All three of my years at these championships, I have come home with pages of notes of things to work on. When I talk with my peers who go to USSS camps, they do more time trials and speed work, but don't learn nearly as much." — Survey respondent, JNT athlete
Athlete Survey Follow-Up • June–July 2026

A Second Athlete Survey Shows Similar Results

According to the results shared during a U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting, athletes were surveyed again after the initial June survey. Team Independent Biathlon understands that, before the follow-up survey, athletes were presented with anticipated benefits of an integration with U.S. Ski & Snowboard and were not presented with alternative organizational options.

June Survey

Concerned / Very Concerned: 21 of 27 (77.8%)
Neutral: 4 of 27 (14.8%)
Supportive: 2 of 27 (7.4%)

July Follow-Up Survey

No: 25 of 41 (61.0%)
Neutral: 11 of 41 (26.8%)
Yes: 5 of 41 (12.2%)

What the results show: The wording and response categories shown for the two surveys are not identical, so they should not be treated as a direct apples-to-apples poll comparison. Even so, the screenshot shows that supportive/“Yes” responses remained a small minority in both surveys: 2 of 27 in June and 5 of 41 in July.

Screenshot from U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting showing June and July athlete survey results

Click the image to view the full-size screenshot.

Source shown: Screenshot from a U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting group chat displaying survey figures shared in the meeting. The additional context about how the follow-up survey was presented reflects Team Independent Biathlon’s account and is identified as such above.

Letter to the Board

Letter to the USBA Board of Directors from the Athlete Representatives

To the US Biathlon Board of Directors,

Thank you for the time, care, and dedication you have invested in supporting US Biathlon. We recognize the significant commitment required to sustain our organization and develop the sport in the United States. Your support makes our success possible and your efforts are sincerely appreciated by athletes.

It is because we share your commitment to the long-term success of biathlon that we feel it is imperative to approach the proposed merge with US Ski & Snowboard thoughtfully, carefully, and with the athlete voice in mind. Athlete feedback regarding the proposed merge has been remarkably consistent since athletes were first notified of the proposal three weeks ago. Across surveys, town halls, and conversations, athletes have expressed significant concern regarding the current terms of the merge agreement. In a survey of top US senior and junior biathletes, 93% of respondents indicated they were concerned or fully opposed to the merge.

The strongest concerns raised by athletes relate to long-term athlete support and funding stability, athlete voice in governance, and the preservation of US Biathlon's culture and identity within a much larger organization. Underlying these concerns is a fear of loss in organizational priority. Currently, our independence protects US Biathlon since organizational leadership is singularly focused on our sport and puts our pursuit of success in biathlon above all else. Athletes have repeatedly cited examples from other smaller sports within US Ski & Snowboard where support, visibility, and influence diminished over time and many athletes believe US Biathlon would succumb to a similar fate should the merge proceed. These fears are justified as the current terms of the merge agreement commit to maintaining current levels of athlete support for only four years.

The conversation surrounding the merge has been heavily centered around funding. While important, funding should not be the only motivator of this decision, and it is essential to do our due diligence by considering other possibilities for addressing funding concerns within the organization. The mission of US Biathlon includes the objectives of growing the biathlon community in the US, developing athletes with integrity, and achieving international and Olympic success. Nesting our sport within a non-specific biathlon organization would fail to preserve our commitment to prioritizing success in biathlon and impede our ability to achieve success on the international stage. Forcing a merge without the support of the biathlon community would demonstrate a lack of integrity. Community input, independence, and autonomy are foundational in driving progress within our organization. Our NGB should be highly responsive to the needs of the athletes and the challenges specific to our sport, which a large conglomerate like USSS would be unable to do.

Given these concerns, we respectfully request that members of the Board of Directors vote NO to the proposed merge, in alignment with the athlete position. In its current form, the proposed merge agreement fails to address major concerns raised by the US Biathlon community and lacks clarity surrounding future governance, funding protections, and organizational structure. We recommend, at a minimum, slowing the timeline of any final decision until these details are better understood and direct athlete feedback is incorporated into the terms of the agreement. Additional time would also allow for an exploration of alternative pathways that could strengthen US Biathlon while preserving our independence and identity.

The level of athlete feedback and engagement throughout this process reflects how deeply athletes care about this organization. We value what has been built within US Biathlon and want to protect the aspects of the organization that are working well while also considering opportunities for growth. We are sharing the athlete perspective respectfully. Our intention is not to resist change for the sake of resisting change, but to advocate for the long-term health of the sport and ensure the athlete voice is considered in such a significant proposed change for the organization.

Thank you for your time, your service to the sport, and your willingness to listen to athlete perspectives. We look forward to collaborating with you to continue to strengthen our organization and achieve success at the highest levels of biathlon competition.

Sincerely,
US Biathlon AAC Athlete Representatives

Advocacy

Newest Advocacy Poster • August 14, 2026
Not a Napkin Plan — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

More Advocacy Posters

More Cake — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

Team Independent Biathlon ethics complaint advocacy poster concerning notice of USBA Board meetings

Click to view full size.

Team Independent Biathlon governance advocacy poster featuring a crossed-out good-governance checklist

Click to view full size.

Is This the Future of Our Voice? Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

High-level poster summarizing the issue

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 1

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 2

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 3

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 4

Click to view full size.

Biathlon: Historic Strength, Independent Future

U.S. Biathlon has been an independent National Governing Body since 1980 and is part of the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic family through the USOPC. Internationally, biathlon is aligned with the International Biathlon Union (IBU), not FIS.

Federal law provides for one certified U.S. NGB for an Olympic sport and connects that NGB to the appropriate international sports federation as the U.S. representative for that sport. Read 36 U.S.C. § 220521 →

Independent since 1980. Aligned with the IBU. Biathlon’s voice should remain biathlon’s own.

Historical-inspired artwork of military skiers climbing a snowy mountain with the words Biathlon: Historic Strength, Independent Future and Independent NGB Since 1980

Historical-inspired artwork. Read U.S. Biathlon’s history →

Show Your Support

Team Independent Biathlon badge

Help spread the word by adding this badge to your social media profile and posting it to your feed or story.

  1. Download the badge using the button below.
  2. Set it as your profile picture on Instagram, Facebook, or X — or post it directly to your feed or story.
  3. Tag a few teammates or friends and encourage them to sign up too.
Download Badge

Vestry Laight Report — Related Context

The Vestry Laight report primarily addresses athlete safety and organizational culture. Its recommendations on transparency, accountability, athlete trust, and leadership provide related context for the current governance discussion, but the proposed USSS–USBA operating alliance remains the primary focus of this site.

Read the full Vestry Laight report →

Official Documents & Sources

Use these primary and official sources to review the governing documents and source material discussed throughout this site.

Finally, for our humble biathlon followers…
Humorous 'I'm kind of a big deal' meme

Global Reach: At Milano Cortina 2026, the IBU reported that biathlon reaffirmed its position as Europe’s most-watched winter sport in its core markets, with more than 170,000 tickets sold and 313+ million digital video views during the Olympic month. Source: International Biathlon Union →

Biathlon penalty loop at the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics

Get Back to Biathlon Business!

Penalty loop: 150m.
USSS bureaucratic loop: indefinite.

INDEPENDENT BIATHLON Our Sport. Our Voice. Our Future.

Stay Informed