What’s at StakeArticlesAthlete FeedbackAdvocacySports Act & HistorySourcesRecommended ViewingStay Informed
NEW TIB UPDATE • OCTOBER 10, 2026

TIB Update: Addressing the Past While Moving Forward

Team Independent Biathlon and USBA have agreed on a path to resolve the Karl Zeile grievance.

TIB’s grievance questioned whether Karl Zeile’s appointment to the USBA Board followed the bylaws. The disagreement concerned how the provisions governing Board appointments and vacancies fit together. USBA maintained that the appointment was valid, while acknowledging that TIB raised a legitimate question about the clarity of those provisions.

Biathletes racing uphill at Soldier Hollow
Moving forward together.
Photo: Soldier Hollow / Utah Olympic Legacy. Source: KPCW.

Under the settlement framework, Karl will remain on the Board, and the elected Board will formally consider and reaffirm his appointment following December’s elections. USBA will review the relevant bylaws and consider clarifications, and TIB will withdraw the grievance with prejudice, ending the complaint. Neither party will admit wrongdoing or concede its interpretation of the bylaws.

As the agreement is formalized, USBA has agreed that TIB can name one member to the Bylaw Revision Committee and that the review will also include an examination of the bylaws’ term-limit provisions and possible recommendations for revising them.

The spirit of this agreement is cooperation: addressing governance concerns constructively and working together toward a stronger USBA.

Thank you to everyone who contributed time, energy, and care. Our shared goal remains a strong, independent U.S. Biathlon organization with clear governance and meaningful member participation.

Past community town hall • September 23, 2026

This meeting date and question deadline have passed. This notice is retained for reference.

PAST COMMUNITY MEETING • SEPTEMBER 23, 2026

USBA Community Town Hall: Help Shape What Comes Next

U.S. Biathlon invited members to share lessons from the proposed merger process and help identify priorities for the sport’s future. Team Independent Biathlon encouraged members to attend and participate constructively.

Wednesday, September 23, 2026 • 3 p.m. MT / 5 p.m. ET • Virtual meeting

Calendar marked 23 with conversation bubbles representing the U.S. Biathlon Community Town Hall

Historical update from September 20, 2026. TIB withdrew the Dexter Paine complaint as moot. References below to the USBA Board listing describe the website at that time.

ARCHIVE GOVERNANCE UPDATE • SEPTEMBER 20, 2026

Dexter Paine Departs the USBA Board and Team Independent Biathlon Withdraws Complaint as Moot

Earlier this summer, Team Independent Biathlon co-founders filed a complaint with the USBA’s Complaint and Grievance Committee against USBA Board member Dexter Paine, alleging that he wrongfully participated in USBA Board meetings concerning the then-planned and proposed merger with U.S. Ski & Snowboard while suffering from self-disqualifying conflicts of interest. (He was a member of the Board of Directors of U.S. Ski & Snowboard at that time as well.) The USBA Board-appointed Hearing Panel ruled that it did not have the authority to act on the Complaint and referred that matter to the USBA Board for resolution. The Board took no action to resolve the Complaint.

Team Independent Biathlon has learned that Mr. Paine is no longer a member of the USBA Board of Directors. TIB has also learned that Mr. Paine is no longer a member of the USBA Foundation.

Accordingly, Team Independent Biathlon is withdrawing its Complaint against Mr. Paine as moot.

This update is being provided so members of the USBA may know that Mr. Paine is no longer a member of the USBA Board of Directors (notwithstanding the USBA website to the contrary) and may also know of TIB’s voluntary withdrawal of the Complaint against Mr. Paine as now moot.

September 13, 2026 message, preserved as originally issued. Its reference to an upcoming October 9 Board meeting is now historical. See the October 10 update above for the Karl Zeile settlement framework.

Rebuilding U.S. Biathlon

Bob Hall and Jack Gierhart Apologize to the Biathlon Membership

September 13, 2026

In a September 13 message to the U.S. Biathlon community, Bob Hall and Jack Gierhart acknowledged strained trust, that some in the community did not feel heard, and the need for broader participation. Their message reveals important common ground with what the biathlon community has been asking for. Below are several highlights, followed by their full message.

We welcome this opportunity for a fresh start and look forward to working constructively with USBA leadership, the Board, athletes, clubs and the broader biathlon community to build a stronger, more transparent and responsive U.S. Biathlon.

From Bob & Jack’s messageWhat the biathlon community has been asking forCommon ground
“We heard you.”Athletes and members want a meaningful voice.LISTEN
“We want to build it with you.”Members want genuine participation, not decisions handed down from above.BUILD TOGETHER
“We acknowledge that some did not feel heard.”Improve transparency, communication and athlete/member participation.RESTORE TRUST
“We accept responsibility for the direction we pursued and for learning from the process.”Understand what happened and make sure lessons result in change.LEARN & IMPROVE
“We need new ideas, broader participation, stronger partnerships...”Draw on the tremendous expertise already within the biathlon community.STRENGTHEN THE SPORT
“We are not going back to where we were...”Don’t return to the status quo—make lasting improvements.MOVE FORWARD

Moving forward also means resolving the serious questions raised during the Alliance process. Those questions should be addressed fairly and independently—distinguishing facts from allegations, learning what needs to change, and protecting everyone involved. That work can be part of rebuilding trust together, not an obstacle to it.

Read Bob Hall & Jack Gierhart’s full message to the U.S. Biathlon community

Dear U.S. Biathlon Community,

The past several months have been an important and challenging period for U.S. Biathlon. After extensive discussion, negotiation, and engagement across our community, we decided not to pursue the proposed Strategic Alliance with U.S. Ski & Snowboard.

This experience, the work it prompted, and what we learned from it, will be important to our future.

First, we want to recognize the extraordinary level of engagement from across the biathlon community. Athletes, coaches, officials, clubs, volunteers, donors, parents, and members invested significant time and energy to understand the proposal, raise concerns, challenge assumptions, offer ideas, and advocate for the future of our sport. We heard you.

We also heard something equally important: a deep passion for U.S. Biathlon and a desire from many of you to play a greater role in building its future. We want to harness that energy.

We explored the alliance because we believe U.S. Biathlon must continue to think differently and ambitiously about how we achieve our goals. We have made significant progress over the past several years. Our athletes, coaches, and staff have elevated our performance internationally. Our clubs, volunteers, officials, and local leaders continue to sustain and grow the sport at home. And our trustees, donors, partners, and Board have provided resources that have allowed us to invest more deeply in our athletes and programs.

We should be proud of that progress. But if we want sustainable competitive excellence and a thriving domestic sport for the long term, we need to take another significant step forward.

The alliance ultimately was not the right path. But the process taught us a great deal.

It also exposed some disconnect with parts of our community that we need to address. At times, the intensity of the past several months did not bring out the best in many of us. Strong disagreements became personal, trust was strained, and we did not always communicate or listen as well as we could have; we acknowledge that some did not feel heard. We all care deeply about this sport, but caring about the same thing does not mean we will always agree on how to get there.

As leaders, we accept responsibility for the direction we pursued and for learning from the process. We believe leadership requires challenging the status quo and exploring opportunities that could significantly advance our mission. It also requires listening, adjusting when circumstances change, acknowledging when we can do things better, and applying what we learn.

That is the Growth Mindset our athletes, coaches, and staff defined as one of our fundamental values, and that we as an organization and leaders need to live by as well.

There is a great deal from this experience that should make us optimistic. The working groups and community discussions generated ideas, relationships, and energy that might not otherwise have emerged. They reinforced the opportunity for deeper collaboration with the broader Nordic community and highlighted the expertise, commitment, and capacity that already exist within U.S. Biathlon.

Now we need to turn that energy into action.

One of our priorities will be creating a stronger and more structured role for our clubs, coaches, officials, volunteers, athletes, and other members of the community in building and managing the sport. But this cannot simply be another initiative designed by the Board and staff and handed to the community.

We want to build it with you, and we will need members of the community to take real ownership of it.

Our role will be to engage, listen, provide staff support and financial resources, and help create the structure that allows people across the country to contribute effectively. The community's role will be to help lead it: bringing expertise, ideas, relationships, energy, and accountability to the work of growing biathlon in the United States. We believe that shared ownership can become one of the lasting positive outcomes of the past several months.

We also need to confront our resource challenges together. USOPC funding has become increasingly focused on near-term performance, sponsorship remains difficult for a sport of our size and international footprint, and while we have successfully grown philanthropic support, that support remains concentrated among a relatively small number of generous donors.

We need new ideas, broader participation, stronger partnerships, and creative approaches to generating the resources required for both competitive excellence and long-term growth. Encouragingly, even in the past several days, members of our community have stepped forward asking how they can help. We intend to take them up on that offer.

The past several months have challenged us, but they do not define us. What matters now is what we do with the experience.

Our values are Respect, Grit, and Growth Mindset. They matter most when things are difficult. Respect asks us to listen and recognize that people who disagree can still share the same goals. Grit asks us to keep working when the path becomes difficult. Growth Mindset asks us to learn, adapt, and become better.

We are not going back to where we were before this process began. We know more today. More people are engaged. New ideas and opportunities have emerged. And we have a clearer understanding of both the challenges ahead and the extraordinary resources that exist within our own community to address them.

And we are not standing still. In the coming weeks, we will create opportunities for community input and feedback and begin working with those who have expressed an interest in helping to define an action plan for the next generation of volunteer engagement within U.S. Biathlon. We want the community to help shape what that looks like, take meaningful ownership of the work, and help lead it forward, with the commitment of staff, Board support, and resources behind it. We will share more about these input opportunities shortly. We also have a board meeting on October 9 at Soldier Hollow where there will be an opportunity for the community to connect with the Board.

Our path forward may be different than the one we contemplated several months ago, but our ambition has not changed. We believe deeply in the potential of U.S. Biathlon and in our ability to build an organization and a sport capable of sustained international excellence and long-term growth at home.

There is important work ahead, and we are moving forward. We look forward to doing that work together.

Thank you for your passion, your candor, your commitment, and everything you do for U.S. Biathlon.

With gratitude and determination,

Bob Hall
Chair, Board of Directors

Jack Gierhart
President & CEO
U.S. Biathlon

LISTEN → UNDERSTAND → FIX → REBUILD

Historical recap from September 10, 2026. USBA subsequently announced on September 13 that it would not pursue the proposed merger with U.S. Ski & Snowboard.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2026 • COMMUNITY UPDATE

USBA Pauses Strategic Alliance

The proposal is not proceeding at this time; the USBA press release gave no indication of a willingness to resume discussion.

Read the USBA Strategic Alliance Update →

On September 9, the U.S. Biathlon Board paused consideration of the proposed Strategic Operating Alliance with U.S. Ski & Snowboard.

After months of intense debate, questions, surveys, letters and extraordinary engagement from athletes, coaches, officials, Olympians, volunteers and members, the proposal is not proceeding at this time.

USBA's message to members included four words that matter:
“We heard our members.”

The last several months have been exhausting for many people in our community. There is an opportunity now to bring the remarkable experience, ideas and energy that surfaced during this process back to where they belong: building a strong U.S. Biathlon Association.

Perhaps the most important thing is to come back together around the athletes, the clubs, the volunteers and the sport we all care about.

Now We Build U.S. Biathlon community working together

Click the image to view full size.

NEW • AFTERTHOUGHTS SEPTEMBER 10, 2026

“What Just Happened?” — Afterthoughts from Art Stegen

Art Stegen reflects on the September 9 USBA Board meeting, the events leading up to it, and what he believes the biathlon community should take from the past several months.

Art is explicit that this is his analysis and opinion: he was not present for every important meeting and says some of his conclusions may involve speculation and assumptions. His piece traces the proposal from the early merger discussions through the September 9 executive session and USBA’s subsequent announcement that consideration of the Strategic Alliance was paused.

LOOKING BACK

Art revisits how the proposal evolved from merger language to a strategic alliance and why secrecy, governance questions and repeated special meetings generated resistance within the biathlon community.

SEPTEMBER 9

He recounts the announcement that there would be no vote, Leif Nordgren’s objection to another executive session, the closed session that followed, and the later notice that consideration of the agreement was paused.

WHERE DO WE GO NOW?

Art’s conclusion turns toward rebuilding trust, allowing staff to get back to their work, and focusing the community on finding and developing talented athletes and supporting them with training, guidance and competition.

“We must all work towards those ends.”
— Art Stegen
NEW COMMENTARY & ANALYSIS SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO TEAM INDEPENDENT BIATHLON • SEPTEMBER 10, 2026

What Happened Behind the Scenes?

The Alliance Discussions Between USBA and USSS — Paused or Withdrawn Amid Serious Allegations

Commentary & Analysis submitted to Team Independent Biathlon by James B. Galanes.

Galanes examines the September 9 Board meeting, information and allegations that surfaced immediately before it, and questions he believes remain for the U.S. biathlon community.

WHAT HAPPENED SEPTEMBER 9?

Galanes reports that the planned vote did not occur and the Board entered executive session after receiving significant new information. Members waiting online were not subsequently brought back for an explanation of the outcome.

WHAT CHANGED?

The article discusses allegations in the Shepard/Schafer letter and a reported anonymous recording of an internal USSS discussion.

WHAT QUESTIONS REMAIN?

Galanes asks who authorized the process, what information and due diligence the Board relied upon, what role USSS played, and why athlete, club and member concerns were not addressed openly before a vote was scheduled.

What’s at Stake

U.S. Biathlon is an independent National Governing Body.

The proposed merger with U.S. Ski & Snowboard is no longer being pursued. This site preserves the proposal, independent reporting, athlete feedback, governing documents and grassroots member efforts that helped protect biathlon’s independence. Current updates focus on clear governance, meaningful participation and rebuilding trust.

Independent Reporting & Historical Archive

ARCHIVE LETTER TO THE US BIATHLON BOARD & COMMUNITY • SEPTEMBER 9, 2026

People on the Snow Survey Authors: Vote No — and Begin a Transparent Process for a Stronger Alternative

Zach Hall, Matt Sabasteanski, Shawn Robison and Tracy Lamb say that after reviewing additional information and meeting with USBA leadership, they cannot recommend approval of the proposed alliance at this time.

Key Statements From the Letter

They acknowledge protections negotiated into the proposal:
“These answers improved our understanding of the proposal.”

But clarify that better information did not change their conclusion:
“The meeting left us better informed, but it did not leave us persuaded that the agreement should be approved.”

On unresolved terms:
“These are not peripheral implementation details. They determine who holds authority, what USBA receives, how performance is enforced, and whether the organization could emerge from an unsuccessful alliance financially and operationally whole.”

On the decision before the Board:
“Based on the information presently available, we cannot recommend approval of the proposed alliance at this time.”

On what should happen next:
“We believe two responsible paths remain available to the Board.” The authors describe either pausing for independent review and community engagement, or voting against the current proposal and beginning a transparent, time-bound process for a stronger alternative.

Letter from Zach Hall, Matt Sabasteanski, Shawn Robison and Tracy Lamb, September 9, 2026.

ARCHIVE LETTER TO THE USBA & USSS COMMUNITY • SEPTEMBER 9, 2026

Jim Galanes: The USBA–USSS Alliance — When the Partner’s Interests Conflict with Biathlon’s

Jim Galanes brings decades of experience in U.S. Nordic skiing:

  • Member of the U.S. Cross Country Ski Team, 1974–1985
  • Three-time Olympian — 1976, 1980 and 1984
  • Women’s Coach for the U.S. Ski Team, 1987–1992
  • Founder of Gold 2002 and the APU Nordic Center, 1996

Ahead of the planned September 9 vote, Jim Galanes asked a fundamental governance question: when the interests of cross-country skiing and biathlon diverge, who will choose biathlon?

Key Statements From Jim Galanes

On the central question:
“It is whether USSS can be trusted with responsibility of working with the Biathlon Board and Staff to develop biathlons whose interest conflict with those of the US Cross Country program.”

On athlete development:
“If USSS controls or substantially influences development pathways for both sports, who advocates for biathlon when the interests of the two sports diverge?”

On transparency:
“Members should understand the actual structure, incentives, costs, risks and benefits.”

On collaboration versus integration:
“But none of those things require US Biathlon to outsource most of its operations to USSS.”

His concluding principle:
“Collaboration does not require surrendering control.”

Context: Galanes discusses anonymous audio and statements attributed to USSS leadership and staff. His letter repeatedly identifies these as reported or alleged statements and notes where context or substantiation remains important.

Letter from Jim Galanes to the USBA and USSS community, September 9, 2026. Published with permission.

ARCHIVE LETTER TO THE USBA BOARD • SEPTEMBER 8, 2026

Marc Sheppard & Jon Schafer: Why the Proposed USBA–USSS Agreement Should Not Move Forward

Dear Biathlon Family:

This letter was shared ahead of the anticipated September 9, 2026 Board vote on the proposed merger with USSS.

The letter is preserved here as part of the record of member concerns during the proposed merger discussions.

Key Statements From the Letter

On due diligence and transparency:
“Instead, there has been a continued lack of transparency in the process and a surprising and disappointing disinterest in following basic due diligence for any financial partnership.”

On stakeholder support:
“...a recent survey authored by Zach Hall, Shawn Robison, Matt Sabasteanski, and Tracy Lamb of registered coach/official members found that only 6.2% favored approving the agreement.”

On independent review:
“Another logical next step would have been to secure an unbiased, professional evaluation of this proposed partnership, its legal ramifications, and the financial and governance guarantees that would be required to ensure a positive outcome for US Biathlon.”

On whether USSS is the only option:
“The notion that the USSS is our only option is simply not true.”

On the path forward:
“This is too important a decision to enter into with such widespread disapproval and well-documented concern.”

“And yes, this is a total scam. They are trying to take control of biathlon so they can strip it and sell it for parts.”
— Jon Schafer, comment shared with Team Independent Biathlon

Editor’s note: They are the assertions of the letter’s authors and are published here as submitted; TIB is not presenting those allegations as independently established facts.

Letter from Marc Sheppard and Jon Schafer to the USBA Board, dated September 8, 2026. Full letter linked above.

ARCHIVE COMMENTARY • SEPTEMBER 3, 2026

Another Special Meeting — September 9

Why not wait for the October in-person Board meeting?

Writing on September 3, Art Stegen reported that another U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting had been called for September 9, 2026, and questioned the timing ahead of the regular in-person Board meeting expected in October.

“The big question is: ‘Are they listening?’” — Art Stegen

Commentary / Opinion — Art Stegen. Published as submitted September 3, 2026.

Humorous illustration asking Special Meeting Again and contrasting September 9 with an October in-person Board meeting

WHY MEMBERS RAISED CONCERNS AT THE TIME

  • A decision this consequential should not be rushed.
  • Four independent surveys showed substantial concern or opposition among the groups surveyed.
  • Members raised unresolved governance, financial and operational questions.
  • The anticipated September 9 vote left members only days to make their views known.

Members’ request at the time: Allow adequate time for review, disclose the complete agreement before any vote, and consider the proposal at an in-person meeting where thoughtful discussion could occur.

Previous Art Stegen Commentaries ▾
Aug. 28 — “What’s Going On?”Aug. 23 — Response on Treatment of Athlete RepresentativesAug. 22 — Athlete Representatives Are Board Members
A MESSAGE OF SUPPORT FROM SURFING
“I hope it comes out positive for you. Independence is priceless.”
— Ian Cairns, Surfer

Cairns was a prominent voice in the campaign supporting surfer-led governance when U.S. Ski & Snowboard sought control of Olympic surfing. USA Surfing was subsequently certified by the USOPC as the National Governing Body for Olympic and Paralympic surfing.

ARCHIVE SURVEY SNAPSHOT • AUGUST 31, 2026

Another Independent Survey Finds Strong Opposition to the Proposed USBA–USSS Relationship

A newly released independent stakeholder survey adds another data point to feedback already gathered from athletes and the broader biathlon community. Across four separate surveys, support for moving forward with the proposed USBA–USSS relationship has remained a minority position among the groups responding.

Four Surveys. A Consistent Message.

Support for the proposed relationship remained a minority response in each survey. The questions, respondent groups and methods differed, so these results should be read as a pattern—not as a single combined scientific poll.

The newest stakeholder survey included 108 respondents, including 65 current coaches or officials/referees/TDs.

Target graphic showing that 94.4 percent of 108 stakeholder survey respondents did not select approval of the agreement as currently contemplated
Survey
SUPPORT
NEUTRAL / OTHER
OPPOSE / CONCERNED
June Athlete Survey
27 athlete responses
7.4%
support
14.8%
neutral
77.8%
concerned / very concerned
July Athlete Follow-Up
41 athlete responses
12.2%
yes
26.8%
neutral
61.0%
no
TIB Website Vote
Anonymous, opt-in live vote
loading…
proxy support
—
two-choice vote
loading…
keep independent
Independent Stakeholder Survey — Aug. 28
108 responses
15.0%
support
17.0%
neutral / need more information
68.0%
oppose
Simple average of the four support percentages: calculating from live TIB vote…
For the TIB vote, a thumbs-down response to “Do you support keeping Biathlon an independent NGB?” is used only as a rough proxy for support of the proposed relationship. The average is unweighted and descriptive only.

The new stakeholder survey reports that 68% of all 108 respondents opposed the relationship as currently understood, while 15% supported it and 17% were neutral or needed more information.

View the Independent Stakeholder Survey Results (PDF) →

Independent survey presented by Zach Hall, Shawn Robison, Matt Sabasteanski & Tracy Lamb. TIB did not conduct this survey. The comparison above uses the principal support/opposition question from each survey where possible; wording and populations differ.

Update • October 10, 2026: TIB and USBA have agreed on a settlement framework for the Karl Zeile grievance. The original filing below is preserved for reference. Read the settlement update →

ARCHIVE • AUGUST 24, 2026 • TIB GOVERNANCE FILING

TIB Co-Founders File Grievance Challenging July 29 Board Appointment

Team Independent Biathlon co-founders Art Stegen, Joan Wilder and Edward G. Williams filed a grievance with U.S. Biathlon on August 24 challenging the Board’s July 29 action to fill a purported director vacancy.

The grievance alleges that the action violated USBA Bylaws governing director elections and vacancies, and asks that the July 29 appointment be declared a nullity and set aside. These are the allegations and requested relief of the grievants; the filing does not itself constitute a ruling on the merits.

Read the Filed Grievance (PDF) →

Team Independent BiathlonGovernance requires process.Filed August 24, 2026

TIB is publishing the grievance as filed so members can read the allegations and requested relief directly.

BEFORE THE SEPTEMBER 9 SPECIAL MEETING

How Members Participated Before the September 9 Meeting

Before the September 9, 2026 Special Board Meeting, members were encouraged to review the issues and communicate respectfully with the Board. These resources are retained for historical reference.

Please communicate respectfully and in your own words.

Do you support keeping Biathlon an independent NGB as required by federal law?

Cast your vote — no sign-up needed.

Latest Coverage & Updates

ARCHIVE COMMUNITY SURVEY • AUGUST 19, 2026

Field of Play Community Survey — August 2026 Archive

An independent group of longtime USBA members and IBU Technical Delegates asked coaches, officials, volunteers, athletes, parents, club leaders, and other supporters what should be protected, improved, or guaranteed in any future organizational relationship.

TIB helped share this independent survey to encourage broad participation. The survey link is preserved as a historical resource; its current availability is not confirmed.

ORIGINAL SURVEY LINK →

Independent survey organized by Zach Hall, Shawn Robison, Matt Sabasteanski & Tracy Lamb. It is not a TIB or USBA survey.

ARCHIVE MEMBER QUESTIONS • AUGUST 2026 ARCHIVE

Ask Questions. Make Your Voice Heard.

Team Independent Biathlon has compiled consolidated due-diligence questions raised across the biathlon community, along with contact information for the USBA Board members serving during the August 2026 discussions.

Please be respectful, identify your connection to U.S. Biathlon, and share your questions and views in your own words.

ARCHIVE MEMBER LETTER • AUGUST 18, 2026

Jay Bowerman to the USBA Board: “This Decision Is About Much More Than Money”

Two-time U.S. Olympic biathlete and USBA life member Jay Bowerman has written to the USBA Board and Integration Committee, drawing on more than 50 years of nonprofit leadership experience. His message: major organizational change cannot succeed without the informed support of athletes, coaches, clubs, and volunteers.

Read Jay Bowerman’s Letter (PDF) →

Earlier Coverage & Background
KEY ANALYSIS MEMBER PERSPECTIVE • AUGUST 12, 2026

Change, Risk & Governance: Questions Before USBA Votes

In a new member submission, Art Stegen examines the proposed USSS–USBA Strategic Alliance through three lenses: how organizational change has been handled, whether the risks have been adequately assessed, and whether the proposed governance structure would preserve USBA's autonomy and independent decision-making.

Read Art Stegen’s Submission (PDF) →

More Cake — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click poster to view full size.

ARCHIVE TIB BOARD QUESTIONS • AUGUST 14, 2026

Not a Napkin Plan: TIB’s Questions for USBA Directors

The consolidated member due-diligence questions are now published. They are intended to help members and Directors examine legal, governance, financial, athlete-rights, operational, and termination issues before a final vote.

Read the Questions (PDF) →

Not a Napkin Plan — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click poster to view full size.

ARCHIVE USBA UPDATE • AUGUST 13, 2026

August 27 Alliance Meeting Postponed

U.S. Biathlon had scheduled a Special Board Meeting for August 27 to review and vote on the proposed Strategic Alliance Agreement. The meeting was subsequently postponed to provide the Board additional time for review, comment and draft completion.

At the time of this August 13 notice, no replacement date had been announced. Later meeting notices are preserved above.

Follow USBA Strategic Alliance Updates →

Source: USBA member email distributed August 13, 2026.

ARCHIVE MEMBER UPDATE • AUGUST 10, 2026

Ethics Complaint Filed Alleging Lack of Notice for Earlier USBA Board Meetings

Team Independent Biathlon co-founders Art Stegen, Joan Wilder, and Ed Williams have filed an ethics complaint under the USBA grievance procedures alleging that members were not provided notice of the March 26–27 and April 29, 2026 Board meetings as required by Chapter 17 of the USBA Bylaws. The complaint requests review through the procedures established by the USBA bylaws and asks the Ethics Committee to determine whether the bylaws governing member notice and attendance were followed.

The complaint alleges that members were denied the opportunity to attend and observe those Board meetings and argues that transparency, member participation, and adherence to governing documents are essential principles for an independent National Governing Body. The requested relief includes a written decision by the Ethics Committee and appropriate action if violations of the bylaws are found.

Team Independent Biathlon poster announcing an ethics complaint concerning notice of USBA Board meetings
ARCHIVE USBA UPDATE • AUGUST 7, 2026

USBA Announces Special Board Meeting

U.S. Biathlon has notified members that the Board of Directors will hold a Special Meeting on August 14, 2026 to consider an ethics complaint involving Board member Dexter Paine.

According to the notice distributed by USBA Secretary Sara Studebaker Hall, the meeting has been called as a Special Meeting pursuant to Chapter 17 of the USBA Bylaws and will be conducted via Zoom.

Source: USBA member email distributed August 7, 2026.

Member Contributions
MEMBER LETTER • AUGUST 5, 2026

Letter to USBA Leadership from Art Stegen

Art Stegen shares observations from the August 1 summer roller ski championships in Jericho, Vermont, and raises questions about the proposed USSS–USBA operating alliance.

Read Art’s letter (PDF) →

MEMBER RESEARCH • AUGUST 2026

USBA-USSS Integration Analysis

A 16-page analysis prepared to help the USBA Board evaluate the proposed integration. It brings together a Max Cobb presentation, interviews across biathlon and Nordic sports, concerns about funding, athlete development and governance, and alternatives—including ways to work with USSS while preserving greater safeguards.

Read the full analysis (PDF) →

Independent Reporting
Associated Press • July 29, 2026

U.S. Biathlon pushes back merger with U.S. Ski & Snowboard

Read the original AP reporting →

FasterSkier • July 28, 2026

Biathlon at a Crossroads

Read the original FasterSkier feature →

Stay Informed

FEDERAL LAW

Federal law (36 U.S.C. §220522(6)) requires that a national governing body:

"demonstrates that it is a member of no more than one international sports federation that governs a sport included on the program of the Olympic Games, the Paralympic Games, the Pan-American Games, or the Parapan American Games."

Why This Law Exists

Why Independent NGB Governance Exists

Congress created the modern NGB structure to protect athlete rights and prevent over-centralized control.

The site’s historical section traces the AAU/NCAA power struggle, the limits of the old amateur-sport system, and Congress’s response in the Amateur Sports Act of 1978. That history matters here because the proposed merger raised questions about governing authority over U.S. Biathlon and how athlete and member voices are protected.

Official USOPC Governance Documents & Bylaws →

Read the full AAU / Amateur Sports Act history and source material
Historical Context
Why Congress created the Amateur Sports Act matters to independent sport governance.

The history below — including the AAU/NCAA struggle over athlete control and Congress's response in 1978 — remains a central part of this site's explanation of why independent sport governance was established.

The one-sport, one-governing-body rule isn't a technicality — it exists because of a real, decades-long history of athletes being harmed when multiple organizations fought over control of their sport.

Athletes caught in a 50-year turf war

Before 1978, the Amateur Athletic Union (AAU) acted as the de facto national authority over amateur sports and Olympic team selection, and repeatedly clashed with the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) over who controlled athletes. The dispute dated back to 1923, when the AAU suspended a sprinter for competing in a European meet against its wishes, and it continued for decades as the two organizations punished each other's athletes — hurting U.S. Olympic teams in the process. Athletes had no say in a fight that was, at its core, about institutional control rather than their own interests.

Direct, unaccountable control over athletes

The AAU had also adopted arbitrary rules barring women from running events and banning any runner who had competed alongside a shoe-sponsored athlete — the kind of unchecked authority over athletes' careers that helped drive Congress to act.

Congress's fix: independence for every sport

The Amateur Sports Act of 1978 (renamed the Ted Stevens Olympic & Amateur Sports Act in 1998) created the U.S. Olympic Committee and required a single, independent National Governing Body for each individual Olympic sport — stripping the AAU of its long-standing monopoly. By late 1980, the AAU had to give up control of eight Olympic and Pan American sports it had governed. The commission that studied the problem specifically called for an authority strong enough to prevent competing organizations from ever again fighting over the same athletes.

Sources: Wikipedia: Amateur Sports Act of 1978, Encyclopedia of Sports Management and Marketing, Congress.gov: S.2727

Primary Source • Federal Law
Title 36, U.S. Code, Chapter 2205

Read the current federal statutory text directly from the official U.S. House U.S. Code website.

Open the official U.S. Code →

Official USOPC Governance Source

Ted Stevens Act & USOPC Bylaws

The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee maintains its current governing documents in one official location, including the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act and the USOPC Bylaws.

Open USOPC Governance Documents & Bylaws →

The existing U.S. House U.S. Code link remains on this site as an additional primary source for the federal statutory text.

Governance Concerns Raised During the Proposed Merger

These concerns were raised during the 2026 proposed merger discussions. The October 10 update describes the Karl Zeile settlement framework; the September 20 update records withdrawal of the Dexter Paine complaint.

The concerns of Team Independent Biathlon were reviewed by Ed Williams, an Olympic biathlete and an experienced commercial litigator with over thirty years of experience as a former Assistant United States Attorney and then a partner in large New York City law firms. Mr. Williams specializes in sports law, arbitrations, civil trials, and appeals, and has been active in sports law, principally sports on the Olympic program, for his entire legal career.

  • Board leadership: We have serious concerns about decisions made by current USBA board leadership that we believe have not served the best interests of the membership.
  • Conflict of interest: We are concerned that at least one individual has served on the boards of both USBA and USSS during the same period that USSS has pursued a merger with USBA, creating a conflict of interest at a critical decision point for the organization.
  • Board nomination process: TIB questioned whether the July 29 Board appointment followed the bylaws. TIB and USBA have since agreed on a settlement framework that includes review of the relevant provisions; neither party will concede its interpretation. See the October 10 update above.
  • Transparency and bylaws: We are concerned that the USBA Board has held closed meetings that we believe were not conducted in accordance with USBA's own bylaws.

Historical athlete feedback collected during the proposed merger discussions. The survey summaries and original athlete statements below reflect views and proposed terms at that time.

Athlete Feedback

Ahead of the board's decision, USBA athletes were surveyed and gathered for a town hall to share their views on the proposed merger. Results below are from 27 athletes surveyed and the discussion that followed.

25 · 93% Concerned or very concerned
4 · 15% Neutral / need more info
2 · 7% Somewhat supportive
Issues ranked by frequency (8 issues)

1. Athlete funding and financial support — 26 of 27 athletes (96%)

Athletes worry that stipends, performance bonuses, race expense coverage, and youth/junior camp budgets could be cut once initial funding protections expire, pointing to USSS's cross-country athletes — many unpaid — as a cautionary comparison. At the town hall, USSS leadership committed to ring-fencing existing funding and adding roughly $500K in year one, but athletes pushed back that a verbal commitment isn't enough without a binding agreement.

"The amount of support and funding that USBA provides to its developing athletes right now is vital. Without that support, I'm unsure how many of our current Youth and Junior athletes would be able to continue at the level that they do." — Survey respondent, JNT athlete

2. Long-term survival of the sport — 23 of 27 athletes (85%)

Nordic combined and ski jumping are frequently cited as examples of smaller Nordic sports being sidelined under USSS. Athletes are concerned that a several-year protection window is mismatched with the decade-plus timeline biathletes typically need to develop internationally competitive results.

"What happened to Nordic combined and smaller Nordic sports under the USSS umbrella should be an enormous red flag." — Survey respondent

3. Athlete voice and governance representation — 17 of 27 athletes (63%)

Athletes fear biathlon's interests could get diluted inside a larger, multi-sport organization, and many felt the timeline for the board's decision didn't leave enough room for a change of this magnitude to be properly considered.

"My worry is that with a merger, the concerns of biathlon will just get muddled in with the plethora of other sports, and decisions will be made by people who don't have the best interest of biathlon as a singular sport." — Survey respondent

4. Transparency and rationale for the merger — 17 of 27 athletes (63%)

Many athletes said they don't understand what USBA stands to gain that it couldn't pursue independently, or what's actually motivating the arrangement from USSS's side.

"Is it a collaboration? Merger? Absorption? Will USBA and the members and athletes be able to keep the USBA identity, or are we just handing over our operational freedom for quick money and a temporary fix?" — Survey respondent

5. Governance structure and decision rights — 16 of 27 athletes (59%)

Athletes questioned whether the USBA board, once folded into USSS as a sport committee, would retain real binding authority or become purely advisory — with biathlon-specific decisions ultimately subject to override.

"USSS is a medals and money focused org, not a team, athlete, and integrity focused org. Any protections should not be trusted." — Survey respondent

6. Team selection procedures — 15 of 27 athletes (56%)

IBU World Cup fields differ significantly in size from FIS Nordic fields, and athletes worry that performance standards built for cross-country wouldn't translate fairly, with no USSS equivalent to biathlon's development circuit.

7. Coaching, high-performance resources and culture — 14 of 27 athletes (52%)

Athletes described USBA's current culture as team- and integrity-focused, in contrast to what they see as a more medals-and-revenue-driven orientation at USSS, and flagged existing tension between dedicated biathletes and cross-over athletes as something a merger could deepen.

8. Youth and junior development pipeline — ~12 of 27 athletes (44%)

Junior national team athletes praised USBA's current youth programming for its individualized, development-focused approach, and worried a merger could shift toward a more generic, time-trial-based model.

"All three of my years at these championships, I have come home with pages of notes of things to work on. When I talk with my peers who go to USSS camps, they do more time trials and speed work, but don't learn nearly as much." — Survey respondent, JNT athlete
Athlete Survey Follow-Up • June–July 2026

A Second Athlete Survey Shows Similar Results

According to the results shared during a U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting, athletes were surveyed again after the initial June survey. Team Independent Biathlon understands that, before the follow-up survey, athletes were presented with anticipated benefits of an integration with U.S. Ski & Snowboard and were not presented with alternative organizational options.

June Survey

Concerned / Very Concerned: 21 of 27 (77.8%)
Neutral: 4 of 27 (14.8%)
Supportive: 2 of 27 (7.4%)

July Follow-Up Survey

No: 25 of 41 (61.0%)
Neutral: 11 of 41 (26.8%)
Yes: 5 of 41 (12.2%)

What the results show: The wording and response categories shown for the two surveys are not identical, so they should not be treated as a direct apples-to-apples poll comparison. Even so, the screenshot shows that supportive/“Yes” responses remained a small minority in both surveys: 2 of 27 in June and 5 of 41 in July.

Screenshot from U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting showing June and July athlete survey results

Click the image to view the full-size screenshot.

Source shown: Screenshot from a U.S. Biathlon Special Board Meeting group chat displaying survey figures shared in the meeting. The additional context about how the follow-up survey was presented reflects Team Independent Biathlon’s account and is identified as such above.

Letter to the Board

Letter to the USBA Board of Directors from the Athlete Representatives

To the US Biathlon Board of Directors,

Thank you for the time, care, and dedication you have invested in supporting US Biathlon. We recognize the significant commitment required to sustain our organization and develop the sport in the United States. Your support makes our success possible and your efforts are sincerely appreciated by athletes.

It is because we share your commitment to the long-term success of biathlon that we feel it is imperative to approach the proposed merge with US Ski & Snowboard thoughtfully, carefully, and with the athlete voice in mind. Athlete feedback regarding the proposed merge has been remarkably consistent since athletes were first notified of the proposal three weeks ago. Across surveys, town halls, and conversations, athletes have expressed significant concern regarding the current terms of the merge agreement. In a survey of top US senior and junior biathletes, 93% of respondents indicated they were concerned or fully opposed to the merge.

The strongest concerns raised by athletes relate to long-term athlete support and funding stability, athlete voice in governance, and the preservation of US Biathlon's culture and identity within a much larger organization. Underlying these concerns is a fear of loss in organizational priority. Currently, our independence protects US Biathlon since organizational leadership is singularly focused on our sport and puts our pursuit of success in biathlon above all else. Athletes have repeatedly cited examples from other smaller sports within US Ski & Snowboard where support, visibility, and influence diminished over time and many athletes believe US Biathlon would succumb to a similar fate should the merge proceed. These fears are justified as the current terms of the merge agreement commit to maintaining current levels of athlete support for only four years.

The conversation surrounding the merge has been heavily centered around funding. While important, funding should not be the only motivator of this decision, and it is essential to do our due diligence by considering other possibilities for addressing funding concerns within the organization. The mission of US Biathlon includes the objectives of growing the biathlon community in the US, developing athletes with integrity, and achieving international and Olympic success. Nesting our sport within a non-specific biathlon organization would fail to preserve our commitment to prioritizing success in biathlon and impede our ability to achieve success on the international stage. Forcing a merge without the support of the biathlon community would demonstrate a lack of integrity. Community input, independence, and autonomy are foundational in driving progress within our organization. Our NGB should be highly responsive to the needs of the athletes and the challenges specific to our sport, which a large conglomerate like USSS would be unable to do.

Given these concerns, we respectfully request that members of the Board of Directors vote NO to the proposed merge, in alignment with the athlete position. In its current form, the proposed merge agreement fails to address major concerns raised by the US Biathlon community and lacks clarity surrounding future governance, funding protections, and organizational structure. We recommend, at a minimum, slowing the timeline of any final decision until these details are better understood and direct athlete feedback is incorporated into the terms of the agreement. Additional time would also allow for an exploration of alternative pathways that could strengthen US Biathlon while preserving our independence and identity.

The level of athlete feedback and engagement throughout this process reflects how deeply athletes care about this organization. We value what has been built within US Biathlon and want to protect the aspects of the organization that are working well while also considering opportunities for growth. We are sharing the athlete perspective respectfully. Our intention is not to resist change for the sake of resisting change, but to advocate for the long-term health of the sport and ensure the athlete voice is considered in such a significant proposed change for the organization.

Thank you for your time, your service to the sport, and your willingness to listen to athlete perspectives. We look forward to collaborating with you to continue to strengthen our organization and achieve success at the highest levels of biathlon competition.

Sincerely,
US Biathlon AAC Athlete Representatives

Advocacy

Historical Advocacy Poster • August 14, 2026
Not a Napkin Plan — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

More Advocacy Posters

More Cake — Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

Team Independent Biathlon ethics complaint advocacy poster concerning notice of USBA Board meetings

Click to view full size.

Team Independent Biathlon governance advocacy poster featuring a crossed-out good-governance checklist

Click to view full size.

Is This the Future of Our Voice? Team Independent Biathlon advocacy poster

Click to view full size.

High-level poster summarizing the issue

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 1

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 2

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 3

Click to view full size.

Thumbnail for detailed poster 4

Click to view full size.

Biathlon: Historic Strength, Independent Future

U.S. Biathlon has been an independent National Governing Body since 1980 and is part of the U.S. Olympic & Paralympic family through the USOPC. Internationally, biathlon is aligned with the International Biathlon Union (IBU), not FIS.

Federal law provides for one certified U.S. NGB for an Olympic sport and connects that NGB to the appropriate international sports federation as the U.S. representative for that sport. Read 36 U.S.C. § 220521 →

Independent since 1980. Aligned with the IBU. Biathlon’s voice should remain biathlon’s own.

Historical-inspired artwork of military skiers climbing a snowy mountain with the words Biathlon: Historic Strength, Independent Future and Independent NGB Since 1980

Historical-inspired artwork. Read U.S. Biathlon’s history →

Show Your Support

Team Independent Biathlon badge

Help spread the word by adding this badge to your social media profile and posting it to your feed or story.

  1. Download the badge using the button below.
  2. Set it as your profile picture on Instagram, Facebook, or X — or post it directly to your feed or story.
  3. Tag a few teammates or friends and encourage them to sign up too.
Download Badge

Vestry Laight Report — Related Context

The Vestry Laight report primarily addresses athlete safety and organizational culture. Its recommendations on transparency, accountability, athlete trust, and leadership provide related context for ongoing work to rebuild trust and improve governance. The proposed merger is no longer being pursued; this site preserves that history and follows the work to strengthen independent U.S. Biathlon.

Read the full Vestry Laight report →

Official Documents & Sources

Use these primary and official sources to review the governing documents and source material discussed throughout this site.

Finally, for our humble biathlon followers…
Humorous 'I'm kind of a big deal' meme

Global Reach: At Milano Cortina 2026, the IBU reported that biathlon reaffirmed its position as Europe’s most-watched winter sport in its core markets, with more than 170,000 tickets sold and 313+ million digital video views during the Olympic month. Source: International Biathlon Union →

Biathlon penalty loop at the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympics

Get Back to Biathlon Business!

Penalty loop: 150m.
USSS bureaucratic loop: indefinite.

INDEPENDENT BIATHLON Our Sport. Our Voice. Our Future.

Stay Informed